Template:Did you know nominations/Matrilineal society of Meghalaya
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 15:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Matrilineal society of Meghalaya
[edit]
Khasi women of Meghalaya
- ...
that Meghalaya, nicknamed "Mädchenland," meaning "Kingdom of girls" (pictured) is said to be one of the largest surviving matrilineal culture in the world?
Created by Nvvchar (talk) and Rosiestep (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 04:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC).
- Comment: for Women's History Month.
- Comment: "-land" means just country or land, not kingdom. Added comma, and am uneasy about the placement of pictured: are girls pictured? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: you're right, as they are women. Furthermore, I've removed the sentence from the article referring to Meghalaya being nicknamed Mädchenland as I could not find scholarly references supporting that. (Mädchenland appears to simply be the name of a project by a German photographer. Sorry for the confusion.) I offer some ALTs in place of the original hook. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:19, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- ALT1:
... that the Indian state of Meghalaya (Khasi women pictured) has one of the largest surviving matrilineal societies? - ALT2: ... that Meghalaya has one of the largest surviving matrilineal societies (Khasi women pictured)?
- ALT3: ... that the matrilineal society of Meghalaya (Khasi women pictured) has a likely correlation with Mahabharata's Nari Rajya?
- Thank you. I'll keep this nom in mind but don't need a qpq right now. I like ALT3 best because the article subject comes first unpiped, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Here I am, reviewing. Interesting topic, on good sources. Some pickiness about the article. The two groups Lyngngam and War come up in the lead, but not in the body. Yes,sourced, but I would still like to meet them again in the body. - "... who have distinguishing features, languages, rites, ceremonies, and habits"- what does features mean here? - Please rethink the first sentence of background. I just understood (from the lead) that Khasi is not one tribe. Where does the million belong. Why only two of five groups mentioned. - Please feel free to link everything on first occurrence in the body, - useful practise in quality articles. - Please give us a bit more about Christian churches and NGOs supporting. The lead should contain a summary,- I see no need for an exception here. - The image is licensed, attractive and pictures the hook well. I'd prefer ALT2, as to the point. - Completely different topic: I need rather desperately a review for a cantata for Sunday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, thanks for the review. I think I've addressed the issues you mentioned, either by removing a phrase (e.g. Seng Khasi is a tribal religious practice and I didn't want to redlink it or explain its association with Christianity in this article), copyediting (e.g. 1 million), or changing the format (e.g. quote box). Please let me know if I've missed something or if you'd like further clarification. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:45, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, thanks for the review. I think I've addressed the issues you mentioned, either by removing a phrase (e.g. Seng Khasi is a tribal religious practice and I didn't want to redlink it or explain its association with Christianity in this article), copyediting (e.g. 1 million), or changing the format (e.g. quote box). Please let me know if I've missed something or if you'd like further clarification. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:45, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
