Template:Did you know nominations/Marie-Louise Gagneur
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 11:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Marie-Louise Gagneur
[edit]
Gagneur in 1872
- ... that the 1864 book La Croisade noire by French feminist writer Marie-Louise Gagneur (pictured) had five editions published by 1872?
- ALT1:... that in 1901, French feminist writer Marie-Louise Gagneur (pictured) was awarded the Legion of Honour?
Created by Joseph2302 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC).
Article is new enough and long enough. Everything is cited inline, but the sources are either in French or I can't access them. What make "Gallicia" and http://www.charlesfourier.fr/spip.php?article1086 reliable sources? Regarding the image, how do we know the photographer's lifespan? No evidence of copyvio or plagiarism on Earwig's. QPQ is a bit lacking. ALT1 seems more interesting but both are supported by the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Gallicia is the French National Library, which would be a reliable source. As noted on the image, its photographer is by Pierre Petit (photographer), who died in 1909 - 109 years ago. So it's in public domain in France and also the US. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- And I'm replaced CharlesFourier.fr as a source. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:05, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Seems like there is no URAA copyright on the image, either. That leaves the QPQ issue only and also perhaps whether The Overlook Press is a good publisher. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've updated the QPQ to explicitly write evrything checked, although that seems bureaucratic seeing as the DYK for it has already run. And many people write far less comprehensive QPQs. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- QPQ updated here. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:06, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
