Template:Did you know nominations/Marianne Katoppo
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 23:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Marianne Katoppo
[edit]- ... that Marianne Katoppo, who wrote the book Compassionate and Free. An Asian Woman's Theology, found the term feminist theology "too loaded"?
- Reviewed: Martin Selig
- Comment: For WikiProject Women in Red's Women in Religion editathon
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 17:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC).
Article is new enough. QPQ done. No pic to review. I added a non-free pic. I don't understand the sentence "A reviewer summarized the goal of the book envisions for a woman in a society dominated by men". Can that be reworded please? The hook is correctly formatted but the article doesn't say why she found the term too loaded. I think we need to tell readers in the article if we are to tease them with it in the hook. The article is a bit short, only just meeting the 1500 characters if the quote towards the end is included, so could be expanded a little. I detected no close paraphrasing or copyvios. AGF on the offline sources. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, also for the image! Sorry that I have other topics right now (Christmas and Easter). I would not know how to word "why" she felt that. Both the writer and the book reviewer are so much better in English than I am, - then my refuge is quote. What do you think of being co-author? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerda Arendt (talk • contribs) 23:24 17 December 2015
- I don't think the roles of reviewer and author sit well together Gerda. I have already edited it more than I should have done! Have a go at it. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- What I meant: be an author, let some else review it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- I have already reviewed it Gerda. Are you going to have a try fixing it? There's not much wrong with it that a small expand and rewording won't solve. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:29, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with you reviewing and switching to author. The same thing was done at Template:Did you know nominations/Übers Gebirg Maria geht. I have no time, sorry, need to polish a Christmas cantata, am behind for one for New Year, in the process of fixing today Beethoven's Academy, on the anniversary, + real life. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Philafrenzy and Gerda Arendt: Edited the "too loaded" in the article. It should work now. Also edited "A reviewer summarized the goal of the book envisions for a woman in a society dominated by men" named the reviewer, and explained that she was talking about Katoppo's view of the virgin Mary as the ideal. — Maile (talk) 21:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with you reviewing and switching to author. The same thing was done at Template:Did you know nominations/Übers Gebirg Maria geht. I have no time, sorry, need to polish a Christmas cantata, am behind for one for New Year, in the process of fixing today Beethoven's Academy, on the anniversary, + real life. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
I am going to AGF on the theological interpretation and tick it. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
