Template:Did you know nominations/Marcel Wüst
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Marcel Wüst
[edit]
Wüst in 2017
- ... that professional cyclist Marcel Wüst (pictured) had to end his racing career after an accident left him blind in one eye? Source: 1
- Reviewed: Electric bath (electrotherapy)
- Comment: Cycling is not often represented on the talk page, maybe this is a good point to bring it into the DYK section, since I edited through the article today anyway.
Created/expanded by Zwerg Nase (talk). Self-nominated at 19:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC).
- Existing article expanded from around 400 to over 5k, more than ten times, and recently (all today). Meets other guidelines - neutral, cited, etc. no copy vio or close paraphrasing suspected. I made some minor tweaks to the hook, which has been verified in the source, is interesting, within length. The photo is properly licensed and used in article. Everything looks good, but no QPQ review yet.
MB 02:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- @MB: Thank you for the quick review. QPQ is taken care of (well, still underway). Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
QPQ done, so all good now. MB 16:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- @MB: Thank you for the quick review. QPQ is taken care of (well, still underway). Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Existing article expanded from around 400 to over 5k, more than ten times, and recently (all today). Meets other guidelines - neutral, cited, etc. no copy vio or close paraphrasing suspected. I made some minor tweaks to the hook, which has been verified in the source, is interesting, within length. The photo is properly licensed and used in article. Everything looks good, but no QPQ review yet.
