Template:Did you know nominations/Manisha Moun

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Manisha Moun

(

)

... that Indian boxer Manisha Moun used to beat up boys during her childhood? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that Manisha Moun's father discovered her boxing interest upon reading a newspaper report of her winning a medal in the sport? Source: "her father got to know that she was a boxer only after reading a newspaper report on her winning a medal in a local competition [2]

ALT2:... that Manisha Moun kept her boxing interest a secret from her father until he read of her medal win in a newspaper?

ALT3:... that Manisha Moun kept her boxing interest a secret from her father until he read in a newspaper that she had won a medal?

Reviewed: ~~Coming soon~~ Template:Did you know nominations/2001 Australian Grand Prix

Created by Dee03 (talk). Self-nominated at 09:52, 12 October 2019 (UTC).

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: QPQ needed. ALT is better. Can you rephrase ALT hook? DBig Xrayᗙ 12:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

@DBigXray: Thanks for the review. QPQ completed now. I've amended the ALT hook: Dee 03 13:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the alt2 hook. I added an ALT3. Any version of the ALT hook may be used by the closing admin.DBig Xrayᗙ 13:17, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Oppose Fails general eligibility criteria of being long enough. ∯WBG^converse 10:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Winged Blades of Godric the tool tells me that the readable prose size is 1600B. (Criteria being >1500B) Did I miss something ? DBig Xrayᗙ 11:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

I am getting 1552 from a count over here after removing section-headers, refs, infoboxes and all that. Borderline passage, for what effectively is, a stub and textbook case for invoking 2(d). ∯WBG^converse 11:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Even then it still exceeds 1500 and I am not going to nit pick over it per WP:NOTBURO. 2(d) leaves it onto reviewer discretion and I have decided that this is not enough reason to hold this DYK. That said, User:Dee03 is encouraged to note the objections by WBG and address it by putting in more bytes into the article. DBig Xrayᗙ 11:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Winged Blades of Godric is encouraged to improve/expand the article if they find an issue. I recommend reviewers/drive-by editors to use the DYKcheck tool to check the character count. Dee 03 12:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Take this as a firm oppose from me absent any substantial improvement, whose possibility I doubt. This article is a stub for all effective purposes. I guess we need to find another reviewer to break stalemate. ∯WBG^converse 13:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Now you're being disruptive by removing sourced information and by "copyediting" with unheard sporting terms like "re-stood" (Boxing isn't elections!) Dee 03 13:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)