Template:Did you know nominations/Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Notability concerns
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company
[edit]- ... that in Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company a U.S. court held general concepts of a movie, like anthropomorphized cars, are not copyrightable?
Moved to mainspace by Info2014bears (talk). Nominated by Colinpmacarthur (talk) at 22:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC).
I cannot see any secondary reliable sources attesting to the subject's notability. All sources used in the article are WP:PRIMARY legal documents. I think the article fails the general notability requirements. There are also other points of concern such as grammatical errors and references which do not verify the facts they are attached to, such as the reference of the "Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School" which does not refer to the case of the article. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Although the nominator's talk page was pinged on November 3, there have been no attempts to address any of the issues raised in the review. Accordingly, the nomination is being closed as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
