Template:Did you know nominations/Mammillaria spinosissima
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mammillaria spinosissima
[edit]
Mammillaria spinosissima var. 'rubrispina' ('Super Red'), also known as spiny pincushion cactus
- ... that Mammillaria spinosissima (pictured) – endemic to central Mexico – produce generally bright red berries that are club-shaped, smooth, and juicy?
- Reviewed: This is my fourth DYK nomination, so I'll probably start reviewing them soon, but after I learn a little more about the expectations.
5x expanded by Rationalobserver (talk). Self-nominated at 23:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC).
This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough, and has also become a GA since nomination. The hook facts have inline citations, the image (photographed by the nominator) is properly licensed, the article is neutral and conforms to policy. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:56, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hold up there. The cited text appears to be "The flowers are usually small and borne profusely in rings like a garland around the apex of the stem; they are succeeded by smooth, juicy, club-shaped berries, usually of brilliant red colour, which are a colourful sight in autumn." - that doesn't fully support the quote. There's nothing about "finely textured" unless that's a rather poor attempt to rewrite "smooth". Also, some ambiguity was lost - "usually [...] red" is not the same as "red". Can we fix this? @Rationalobserver: Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Adam Cuerden: Yes. I wrote "finely textured" as a way of paraphrasing "smooth". What do you suggest? RO(talk) 15:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Rationalobserver: I'd say "smooth" was basically a technical term in this case. There's a fairly standard descriptive language in botany. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- I don't mind changing it, but finely textured is a perfectly acceptable paraphrase: ([1]). Can I just edit the suggested hook, or do I have to make another one with this change? Also, do you think I should include "usually"? RO(talk) 16:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Rationalobserver: I think "smooth" is by far a more generally understandable term for a lay audience to be given. I think we can just edit the hook. As for "usually" - maybe paraphase that to "generally" or the like, but I think it would be useful. Given "club-shaped" is a standard term - found three sources using it, some referring to the genus - I'd say that "generally bright red berries that are club-shaped, smooth, and juicy" would be a reasonable phrasing? It's different enough to avoid any accusations of copyvio, but keeps the terms that are generally used in botany. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me, Adam. I made the suggested edit. Thanks for taking a look! RO(talk) 16:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- MOVED TO PREP AREA 2. Also, where the hell are the instructions hiding nowadays? I can't find the exact phrasing you're meant to use on these things, and it's not been THAT long since I last did a promotion here. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me, Adam. I made the suggested edit. Thanks for taking a look! RO(talk) 16:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Rationalobserver: I think "smooth" is by far a more generally understandable term for a lay audience to be given. I think we can just edit the hook. As for "usually" - maybe paraphase that to "generally" or the like, but I think it would be useful. Given "club-shaped" is a standard term - found three sources using it, some referring to the genus - I'd say that "generally bright red berries that are club-shaped, smooth, and juicy" would be a reasonable phrasing? It's different enough to avoid any accusations of copyvio, but keeps the terms that are generally used in botany. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- I don't mind changing it, but finely textured is a perfectly acceptable paraphrase: ([1]). Can I just edit the suggested hook, or do I have to make another one with this change? Also, do you think I should include "usually"? RO(talk) 16:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Rationalobserver: I'd say "smooth" was basically a technical term in this case. There's a fairly standard descriptive language in botany. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Adam Cuerden: Yes. I wrote "finely textured" as a way of paraphrasing "smooth". What do you suggest? RO(talk) 15:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
