Template:Did you know nominations/Lyndon B. Johnson 1964 presidential campaign
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 16:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Lyndon B. Johnson 1964 presidential campaign
- ... that although the Daisy ad (pictured) was aired only once, it is considered to be one of the most important factors for victory in Lyndon B. Johnson's 1964 presidential campaign? Source: The Daisy Ad and an Appeal to Fear; How the “Daisy” Ad Changed Everything About Political Advertising: Smithsoian magazine; Library of Congress
- Reviewed: Forests in Turkey
- Comment: As per discussion on 1, videos can be added in hooks.
Created by Kavyansh.Singh (talk). Self-nominated at 18:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC).
- Article is a new spin-off, that is clearly notable. Hook is cited to the Smithsoian. I admit I was more interested in the Daisy advertisement than the campaign article, but that means the hook is certainly attention grabbing. There are a few formatting errors on the talk page, and the spin-off needs to note any copied content properly for attribution purposes. Earwig's bot reports close paraphrasing of the "Because tonight the contest is the same..." speech, which is a direct quotation, but may be worth trimming. I can't remember if US Federal Government campaign speeches are public domain or not, can you advise? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333: Hi, thanks for your comments. I have resolved all the formatting errors on the talk page and have properly attributed some copied content on talk page. I guess the direct quotation can be ignored in copyvio, but I have still trimmed the quote. I have taken the campaign speeches from certain sources which are cited in the article. Also, the video file is in public domain, and even a Featured picture, so I don't feel that is an issue. I guess most of the issues are resolved. Kindly let me know of any other problem. Thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Kavyansh.Singh, I'm still concerned that the copyvios tool reports "51.6% : Violation possible". Can you look into that in a bit more depth? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:51, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ritchie333, I have further reduced the content of the speech, which is under direct quotation. The copyvio detector now shows "Violation Unlikely" Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:59, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, I think all my concerns are now addressed, so I can pass this now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)