Template:Did you know nominations/Lynde Shores Conservation Area

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 21:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Lynde Shores Conservation Area

(

)

Lynde Shores Conservation Area

* ... that Lynde Shores Conservation Area (pictured) contains one of the only remaining coastal wetlands along northern Lake Ontario? Source: Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority

- ALT1:... that Lynde Shores Conservation Area (pictured) is an important resting point for shorebirds and waterfowl migrating along Lake Ontario? Source: 2
- ALT2:... that Lynde Shores Conservation Area (pictured) is the subject of a long-term watershed management study? Source: 3

Reviewed: One57
Comment: File:Sign (8872028086).jpg can also be used as an image. Its former popularity as a destination for cruising might also make a good hook, though others may disagree.

Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC).

The phrase "one of the only" in the proposed hook is illogical. It could be "one of a few" but is not the only such wetland. The claim is dubious since other wetlands along the north shore of Lake Ontario in Durham Region include the Rouge River estuary, Frenchman's Bay, Duffins Creek estuary, the Second Marsh in Oshawa, and McLaughlin Bay within Darlington Provincial Park. Lastly, being one of a few is not as interesting for a hook. Flibirigit (talk) 01:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - ?
Interesting: - ?

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The nominated article meets requirements for newness, length and sourcing. It is neutral in tone and no plagiarism issues were detected. Images used in the article are free and licensed on the Commons. QPQ requirement is complete. Please see earlier comments regarding the proposed hook. I also recommend proposing other hooks. Measurement units should make use of the {{convert}} template. Flibirigit (talk) 02:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

@Flibirigit: Alt hooks added. Morgan695 (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Great, I will have a look later tonight or tomorrow. Flibirigit (talk) 17:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

ALT1 and ALT2 are both good to go. The wording "one of the only" still needs to be corrected in the "History" section and ALT0. If you want to propose a hook on cruising, please do. The more hooks the merrier. Cheers. Flibirigit (talk) 20:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

@Flibirigit: Aligned article copy to better align with the source claim that Both the Lynde Creek Marsh and Cranberry Marsh provide many important functions that are typical of the few remaining coastal wetlands found along this northern section of the Lake Ontario shoreline. I've struck ALT0 because I don't think a modified version would be interesting. Morgan695 (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Approving ALT1 and ALT2. Each hook is reasonably interesting, properly mentioned and cited in the article, and verified by the sources. Article now adheres to all DYK criteria. Flibirigit (talk) 19:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)