Template:Did you know nominations/Lohn Estate
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lohn Estate
- ... that between 1942 and 1994 the official guests of the Swiss Confederation stayed at the Lohn Estate, a manor in Kehrsatz, Canton of Bern? Source: Bilfinger, Monica (2010). Lohn Manor in Kehrsatz. Bern, Switzerland: Society for the History of Swiss Art SHSA/Swiss Confederation. p. 2, 10-11 Office fédéral des constructions et de la logistique, Le manoir du Lohn
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kate Baker
- Comment: I am two days late with this DYK. I hope some leeway can be granted.
Improved to Good Article status by JBchrch (talk). Self-nominated at 18:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC).
- A quick drive-by comment, are there any good photos of the estate that could be added as a visual? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- I will do the full DYK review, and will enact WP:IAR for the nomination being 2 days late. After all, the nominator is not a DYK regular (they have 1) previous DYK nomination) and they did a QPQ despite being exempt from doing so (as first 5 DYKs don't require a QPQ), so seems fine to allow this nomination to run. If anyone has any issues with this, please discuss at WT:DYK
Article is long enough (6143 characters), is a GA, I'm accepting the 2 day late nomination (became GA on 12 June, nominated 21 June) and article is within policy (AGF on offline sources)- Hook is short enough, interesting, in the article and well cited
- QPQ done, even though user was exempt from doing so
Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. AGF on offline sources. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Joseph2302, and sorry again for being late. In response to Sdkb (thanks for the suggestion—completely forgot to answer, sorry about that), all the best free photos are in the article already, but unfortunately they aren't very good, especially compared to the copyrighted stuff [1], so I figured that other nominators would have better pictures. Not sure if that makes any sense, though. JBchrch talk 14:12, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
