Template:Did you know nominations/Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Graearms (talk) 15:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.

(

)

... that in Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., U.S. Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun took the unusual step of writing a separate concurrence to his opinion for the Court? Source: Rodney Smolla, "The Displacement of Federal Due Process Claims by State Tort Remedies: Parratt v. Taylor and Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co", 831 U.Ill.L.Rev. 831, 862 (1982): "Justice Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court in Zimmerman and, in an unusual procedure, also authored a concurring opinion joined by three other justices ..."
- ALT1: ... that Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. was the first time a majority of U.S. Supreme Court justices agreed that a challenged statute failed the rational basis test? Source: John Metzke, Constitutional Law - Equal Protection Analysis - Awarding Public Works Contracts: Granting Preference to Resident Bidders -Works Contracts: Granting Preference to Resident Bidders - Galesburg Construction Co. v. Board of Trustees 18 L. & W. L. Rev. 393, 399 (1983) "Logan was significant because it marked the first modern case in which a majority of the justices agreed that a statute should be held unconstitutional under the rational basis standard."
- Comment: I should add that while the part of the article that supports the hook is complete, I will continue to add to the article while this nomination is pending, as I often do. I do not expect at this point to find any other material which would make a good hook, but if I do, I will add it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rana X. Adhikari

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self-nominated at 04:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC).

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Great job. Good to go on main or ALT. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

To Prep 2