The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Overall: I think the original DYK suggestion is the best of the three. Make sure the article to which you are referring is both linked and emboldened. Also, a QPQ is needed before this can be passed.Tkbrett (✉) 12:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks Mandarax. I'm not certain on that tool, as it indicates that I have never done a DYK even though I have reviewed at least a few. Tkbrett (✉) 20:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you @Mandarax: and @Tkbrett: Yes, this is only my third DYK but happy to do QPQ in the future. You can visit my user page to confirm my contributions. User: SatDisSatDis (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Sounds good. I believe the first hook is good to go. Tkbrett (✉) 01:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)