Template:Did you know nominations/List of tributaries of Shamokin Creek
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
List of tributaries of Shamokin Creek
[edit]- ... that although Shamokin Creek is a Warmwater Fishery, all of its twelve named tributaries are Coldwater Fisheries?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 18:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC).
Long enough (2213 characters), moved from namespace on August 24, 2015, well written but the source does not describe it as such. Donnie Park (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Donnie Park: I don't know what you mean. CWF is an abbreviation for Coldwater Fishery and WWF is an abbreviation for Warmwater Fishery. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 11:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Jakec:
For a non-fishing person, I would had not known that as CWF is too technical to somebody who knows nothing about fishing; IMO, I only found out what CWF stand for when I found this link. So I will give it a conditional pass if this is clear what it is as any other reviewers wouldn't know either. Donnie Park (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Jakec:
The article is fully referenced, neutral and with no close paraphrasing. Hook is interesting & verified through online sources. QPQ done. Good to go to me! FrogmanOfTheSahara (talk) 05:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
This green-tick "Pass" is in doubt. It is part of a series of 15 (as of this posting) green-tick "Pass" done within minutes of each other several days in September. Please see WT:DYK. — Maile (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Article was moved to mainspace on August 24. Prose section is long enough, and the article meets DYK policies. The hook is interesting, and has been verified by the provided source. No image is provided. Good to go.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sovereign Sentinel (talk • contribs)