Template:Did you know nominations/List of Mexican National Championships
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 15:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
List of Mexican National Championships
[edit]- ... that one of the Mexican National professional wrestling championships, the Mexican National Welterweight Championship that was created in 1934, is the oldest still-promoted championship in existence?
- ALT1:... that the Mexican National Welterweight Championship, one of Mexico's professional wrestling championships, is the oldest still-promoted championship in existence?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lincoln Enterprises
- Comment: Thought I would change it up and go for a championship article instead of a show article
Created by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 22:58, 17 August 2016 (UTC).
- No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 22:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4194 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (3.8% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 195 characters
- ✓ MPJ-DK has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Lincoln Enterprises was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that you've had to wait so long for a review. Hook is interesting and neutral. AGF on offline source. But I do have some issues with sourcing in this article – quite a lot of the text looks unreferenced to me. Is the entire second paragraph (except the last sentence) sourced to citation 4? If it is, then that's okay, but I want to make sure. Same question for the first half of the first paragraph and citation 1. I also think there could be merit in writing the hook slightly, so I have added an ALT. Let me know what you think. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 13:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- A Thousand Doors - that is a good catch on the sourcing. I must have posted a different version of the article than what I have on my PC, because that was sourced better than what was posted. Either way I believe I have addressed the concerns of being unreferenced now. And I am good with the slightly edited version you posted for ALt1. MPJ-DK 22:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Looks much better, ALT1 is now good to go. Great work! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 13:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- I came to promote this but had a look at the NWA World Heavyweight Championship article before doing so and saw that it claimed of the NWAWHC "This effectively makes it the oldest surviving wrestling championship in the world." This casts some doubt on the hook fact and it would be better to choose a new uncontroversial hook in the present DYK climate. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Cwmhiraeth - To quote the info box on that page "Date established: July 14, 1948", that is the fact, the NWA did not exist when this championship was created, that is a fact as well. People can claim what they want about the NWA title, claims are not facts. "Effectively" is not the same as "actually" - I present sourced facts as a hook, verifiable facts as a hook, I see no need to change it when it is true. MPJ-DK 11:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- OK, I agree with you. This nomination is ready for promotion. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)