The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29talk 16:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
@Moscow Connection: Reping due to a typo. With that said, how do the following hooks sound?
ALT1 ... that 2022 Junior Eurovision winner Lissandro earned the nickname "Elvissandro" due to his love of Elvis Presley?
ALT2 ... that 2022 Junior Eurovision winner Lissandro has done voice-overs for several television series and animation films?
The article is also a bit on the shorter side so if possible I'd like to see it beefed up more. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
If there's a desire to keep some level of mystery and encourage clicks, we could also have ALT1a ... that 2022 Junior Eurovision winner Lissandro has the nickname "Elvissandro"?, but I'd leave it to the reviewer to decide. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
A QPQ has not been given despite multiple pings and talk page message. The nomination may continue if one is given. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 16:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
@BuySomeApples: Thank you so much! I did another QPQ, so you should use yours for another review, in order to save your time and effort.. :-) --Moscow Connection (talk) 04:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: Sorry. I'm back and I promise I won't disappear again. (Btw, I had a very good excuse last year. But this time it is just that I was a bit distressed after an AfD discussion. And I switched to a computer that feels uncomfortable to work on. I've tried to do a QPQ. And I'm trying now.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
I will search for more sources tomorrow. I'm sure I can expand the article. I like ALT1 the most. --Moscow Connection (talk) 04:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Overall: ALT1 and ALT1b are cited and interesting enough. The article is new enough (at the time of nom) and just barely long enough but there's a couple source problems. The article includes his birth date but this source only seems to include his birth year. Also, the information about "Oh Maman!" being released as a single is sourced to Apple Music, are there any secondary sources we can use?BuySomeApples (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
I have found a source [1], but I will search for a better one tomorrow. --Moscow Connection (talk) 16:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find a better source for the complete sentence ("On 28 October 2022, the song was released as a single"), but I have found a source for the song being released as a single by MCA, see my edit: [2]. (The Parisien article is partially behind a paywall, so I added a Google snippet quote.) I hope it is enough, the release date is still sourced from Apple Music. --Moscow Connection (talk) 23:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you @Moscow Connection: I removed the birth date and left the year, and changed the date of the single's release to the month of release so everything is cited now. I think this one is ready. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Note: The article is very short, at only 1570 bytes of prose, and with lots of possibilities for concision. I am unwilling to promote such a borderline article; other promoters may disagree. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 05:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
OK, I'll expand it tomorrow. --Moscow Connection (talk) 03:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
After recent copyediting (for concision?), the article is now down to 1250 prose characters, nowhere near enough. Moscow Connection, it's been five days and that expansion you said you'd do remains undone. Please complete the now-required expansion in the next couple of days if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
If Moscow Connection returns in the next couple of days and makes the necessary changes, this can be reopened. If not, this should be closed as unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 02:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
@AirshipJungleman29 and Z1720: I'm very sorry, I'm back. It's embarrasing... I have some computer problems. And some real life tasks that need to be done. --Moscow Connection (talk) 08:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
It's roughly 1660 characters now. (Still expandable. I just used the sources I had found on 26 February [3]. But I have to go soon and will return in three hours or so.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 09:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
A QPQ has not been given despite multiple pings and talk page message. The nomination may continue if one is given. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 16:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Review still needed for ALT1. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
ALT1 and ALT1b are cited and interesting enough. The article is new enough (at the time of nom) and just barely long enough but there's a couple source problems. 
Note: The article is very short, at only 1570 bytes of prose, and with lots of possibilities for concision. I am unwilling to promote such a borderline article; other promoters may disagree. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 05:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
After recent copyediting (for concision?), the article is now down to 1250 prose characters, nowhere near enough. Moscow Connection, it's been five days and that expansion you said you'd do remains undone. Please complete the now-required expansion in the next couple of days if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)