Template:Did you know nominations/Lineus sanguineus
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 09:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lineus sanguineus
[edit]... that the banded nemertean, a ribbon worm, readily breaks into pieces, each of which is able to regenerate?Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Reviewed: Pietà (Titian)
- Comment: The source for the hook refers to Lineus vegetus which is a synonym of Lineus sanguineus
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC).
- New and long enough, within policy guidelines including a clear copyvio, neutral etc. Hook is good for format and content, interesting worm facts covered fully by cites in the article. Thanks for the heads up regarding the synonyms which helps checking the books. The QPQ is done. All looks fine. Just before I green tick i'm going to suggest an alt1 because I thought the extra info is emphatic and eye catching, otherwise hook is fine.
- ALT1... that the banded nemertean ribbon worm readily breaks into pieces, each of which can regenerate into a whole worm within 4 weeks? Mramoeba (talk) 15:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I am happy with ALT1 and have struck the original hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Great. Thanks for the interesting article. Ready to go. Mramoeba (talk) 17:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
@Mramoeba: since you added a new fact to the hook, you aren't allowed to approve it, per Rule H2. New reviewer needed for ALT1. Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Approving ALT1, which is interesting and checks out with appropriate inline citations. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I am happy with ALT1 and have struck the original hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
