Template:Did you know nominations/Lilium lophophorum
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lilium lophophorum
Lilium lophophorum flower
- ... that the unique flower shape of Lilium lophophorum (pictured) is adapted to protect its reproductive organs from the harsh UV light and torrential rains of its habitat?
- Source: "The habitats of L. lophophorum and L. nanum are mainly alpine grasslands and the adjacent niche at higher altitudes. These habitats often experience torrential downpours and have strong ultraviolet rays. The nodding and campanulate flowers can protect the reproductive structures against heavy rainfall and ultraviolet rays (Gao, Harris & He, 2015)." Su, Danmei; Xie, Fumin; Liu, Haiying; Xie, Dengfeng; Li, Juan; He, Xingjin; Guo, Xianlin; Zhou, Songdong (5 March 2021). "Comparative analysis of complete plastid genomes from Lilium lankongense Franchet and its closely related species and screening of Lilium-specific primers". PeerJ. 9: e10964. doi:10.7717/peerj.10964. ISSN 2167-8359. PMC 7938781. PMID 33717697.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Madagascar banana
- Comment: Thank you in advance to the reviewer for their time! If anyone has a more succint wording for ALT0, I would be more than happy to hear it. As it stands, it is a bit wordy and convoluted in my eyes.
Created by Ornithoptera (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 48 past nominations.
Ornithoptera (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2024 (UTC).
Interesting flower, on fine sources, offline and foreign sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and illustrates the hook perfectly! - in the article, please check for ascending numbers of references when there's more than one. - The hook is fine by me, but perhaps others can still improve. --
- Hi Gerda Arendt, thank you for your review! In terms of "check for ascending numbers of references when there's more than one", what do you mean by that? I'm not entirely sure what that entails on my end. Ornithoptera (talk) 19:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Example: "was polyphyletic,[15][10][16]" - purists will want "was polyphyletic,[10][15][16]". That is only one example, and I'm not a purist, but in case you want to go to higher quality, such as WP:GA, I recommend to change it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Figured as much, thought it would be best to ask regardless. I'll keep it in mind down the line if I feel like I should go down that path. Regardless, wonderful working with you Gerda Arendt! Ornithoptera (talk) 19:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Example: "was polyphyletic,[15][10][16]" - purists will want "was polyphyletic,[10][15][16]". That is only one example, and I'm not a purist, but in case you want to go to higher quality, such as WP:GA, I recommend to change it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Gerda Arendt, thank you for your review! In terms of "check for ascending numbers of references when there's more than one", what do you mean by that? I'm not entirely sure what that entails on my end. Ornithoptera (talk) 19:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
