Template:Did you know nominations/Life After Life (TV series)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Life After Life (TV series)
- ... that the TV series Life After Life is about a woman who lives the same life over and over again? Source: https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/apr/19/life-after-life-review-a-thoroughly-addictive-weepathon
- ALT1: ... that the goal of the TV adaptation of Life After Life's was purportedly "apparent from the start: making people cry"?
- ALT2: ... that one reviewer said of the TV adaptation of Life After Life, "if you like the feeling of being overwhelmed by vicarious trauma and grief then you're in for a treat"?
- ALT3: ... that the TV adaptation of Life After Life was described as "bingeworthy", but also "practically plotless"?
- Comment: Article newly created from redirect
Created by Llewee (talk). Self-nominated at 02:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC).
Per WP:DYKSG#C7, hooks about works of fiction (such as TV shows) cannot solely be about plot points or other in-universe information. They must have some connection to the real world. As such, a new hook is needed here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- As the nominator hasn't edited in a few days and hasn't responded to a talk page message regarding the hook, can a new editor propose new hooks so that the nomination can continue? Pinging two DYK regulars who have experience in doing TV show hooks: Theleekycauldron and Soaper1234. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: suggested some review-based hooks; my thanks to The Guardian for using that evocative language Wikipedia avoids. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'll wait for Soaper and the nom's feedback before proceeding with the full review. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: suggested some review-based hooks; my thanks to The Guardian for using that evocative language Wikipedia avoids. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- As the nominator hasn't edited in a few days and hasn't responded to a talk page message regarding the hook, can a new editor propose new hooks so that the nomination can continue? Pinging two DYK regulars who have experience in doing TV show hooks: Theleekycauldron and Soaper1234. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Apologies, @Narutolovehinata5: and @Theleekycauldron: I wasn't able to think of any interested non-plot based blurbs straight away and then I was busy with work for a while and forgot about it. The suggestions you came up with seem quite good especially given the slightly limited material available. I think alt 3 is probably the best one.Llewee (talk) 23:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Since Soaper hasn't edited in a while I guess I can proceed with the review without them? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: Whenever you want to is fine by me Llewee (talk) 23:47, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Article was nominated on time and is long enough. No close paraphrasing was detected (the only matches were a Facebook page copying from Wikipedia and another source that also mentioned the quotes mentioned in the article). I agree with the nomination that ALT3 is the best option; it's verified in the source. No QPQ is needed as it appeared the nominator has no previous nominations. GTG. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
