Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Lesser grison

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 08:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Lesser grison

[edit]

5x expanded by Anaxial (talk). Self nominated at 21:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC).

  • Article length and age are fine except for the stub tag, which must be removed per supplementary rule D11. Otherwise, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns; reliable sources are used, although I'm worried about that one source you use 10 separate times. APerson (talk!) 14:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I can't see a stub tag in the article, but I've removed the Project stub class listing on the Talk page, since I assume that's what you mean. If not, and I've just missed the tag, my apologies. Anaxial (talk) 19:14, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Was the removal of the Project sub class listing insufficient? As I say, I can't see an actual stub tag. You do mention a particular source that I used several times, but since you say it's reliable, and I don't think supplementary D12 applies here (there are, I think, enough sources to establish notability), I'm unclear as to what you'd like me to do on that point, if anything. If you could clarify what else needs to be done, that would be great, thanks. Anaxial (talk) 22:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Reviewer needed to check to see whether any issues remain. Article is no longer tagged or rated as a stub. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Length and date check out fine, no longer tagged as a stub. Hook is referenced to an offline source, for which I will AGF. The variety of sources look fine to me, and spotchecks reveal no copyvio. Good to go. Harrias talk 13:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)