Template:Did you know nominations/Leonia Alternative High School
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 02:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Leonia Alternative High School
- ... that opposition to the Leonia Alternative High School from the local teachers union gave rise to a lengthy legal battle? Source: see footnote 3 in article among others
- ALT1: ... that the Leonia Alternative High School of the 1970s emphasized use of volunteer community resource people as instructors, which led to opposition from the local teachers union? Source: see footnote 6 in article among others
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Saskatchewan Conservation House
Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self-nominated at 12:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Leonia Alternative High School; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Review underway... Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 09:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- The article was started on 23rd December and nominated on that date. Well above Stub-class, although not yet rated, and >1,200 words. Well-referenced to credible and high-quality sources, including what seems to be the definitive study of the school (Kaplan 1977) – which I have accessed through JSTOR. I have checked all sources that were accessible (most of them) for copyvio/close paraphrasing (none found) and accuracy. Good to see extensive use being made of local and national newspaper archives: I am a big advocate of this. Neutrality is fine. Both hooks can be verified in multiple sources and are compliant with policy and suitably interesting; I don't have a preference as to which is better. QPQ review confirmed.
- Wasted Time R Thank you for this very interesting article. Verified and ready to go. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 10:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)