Template:Did you know nominations/Leanne Mohamad

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Leanne Mohamad

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that despite not being affiliated with a political party, Leanne Mohamad came within 528 votes of defeating shadow health secretary Wes Streeting in the 2024 UK general election?

• Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/pro-gaza-candidates-dent-labours-uk-election-victory-2024-07-05/

• Reviewed:
• Comment: Not created by myself, but expanded (hopefully) sufficiently to get it up to DYK status.

Created by Iostn (talk) and ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Iostn (talk) 19:21, 20 July 2024 (UTC).

• Note: the original hook was above 200 characters and thus cannot be used. Below are truncated versions that meet the requirements:

• ALT0a ... that despite not being affiliated with a political party, Leanne Mohamad came within 528 votes of defeating shadow health secretary Wes Streeting in the 2024 UK general election?
• ALT0b ... that despite being an independent candidate, Leanne Mohamad came within 528 votes of defeating shadow health secretary Wes Streeting in the 2024 UK general election?

The original hook is thus struck: a full review is still needed. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

@User:Narutolovehinata5 The hook (initially under 100chs) got messed with by the page creator... who has seemingly been making a lot of dubious changes, including to the page itself. I'll really have to re-review this, even if it was fine beforehand... Iostn (talk) 19:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

New reviewer needed. Z1720 (talk) 15:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Good to go! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNuggeteer (talk • contribs)