Template:Did you know nominations/Lakewood station

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Lakewood station

(

)

... that an allegedly phallic sculpture at Lakewood station attracted controversy because the nearby area was once home to sex businesses? Source: Leventis, Angie (May 17, 2006). "Sculpture design provokes emotions in Lakewood". The News Tribune. p. A1.

Reviewed: Gordon Juckes

5x expanded by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 03:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC).

@SounderBruce: Here is my review. epicgenius (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I'll accept the hook reference in good faith since it's offline. epicgenius (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

I suggest a minor modification
- ...that an allegedly phallic sculpture at Lakewood station attracted controversy because the area around the station had once been home to sex businesses? epicgenius (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Added the word "nearby", which easily implies the area around the station without adding too much length. Sounder Bruce 18:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

@SounderBruce: OK, this article is good to go now. epicgenius (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)