Template:Did you know nominations/Lafler v. Cooper

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Lafler v. Cooper

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in a dissenting opinion, Justice Scalia wrote that the US Supreme Court had elevated "plea bargaining from a necessary evil to a constitutional entitlement"? Source: "Today, however, the Supreme Court of the United States elevates plea bargaining from a necessary evil to a constitutional entitlement." (566 U.S. 156, 186 (2012))
  • ALT1: ... that when dissenting from the US Supreme Court's decision in Lafler v. Cooper, Justice Scalia wrote that the Court had elevated "plea bargaining from a necessary evil to a constitutional entitlement"? Source: "Today, however, the Supreme Court of the United States elevates plea bargaining from a necessary evil to a constitutional entitlement." (566 U.S. 156, 186 (2012))
  • ALT2:... that the US Supreme Court created a new body of constitutional law in Lafler v. Cooper? Source: "the court has created a new body of constitutional law" ([1]
  • ALT3:... that in Lafler v. Cooper, the US Supreme Court held that criminal convictions can be overturned if defense counsel ineffectively plea bargained? Source: "A divided Supreme Court ruled for the first time Wednesday that the guarantee of effective legal representation applies to plea bargain agreements" ([2])
  • ALT4:... that in Lafler v. Cooper, the US Supreme Court held that criminal defendants have a constitutional right to an effective lawyer when plea bargaining? Source: "A divided Supreme Court ruled for the first time Wednesday that the guarantee of effective legal representation applies to plea bargain agreements" ([3])

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kyrö Distillery Company
• Comment: I'm aware of the neutrality complications from quoting from only one justice, so I proposed a number of other hooks. My only concern is that I can't seem to think of any brilliant, per se "hooky" hooks at the moment. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Moved to mainspace by L235 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC).

Substantial article on good sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I like the quote, because I think it shows best for the average reader what's going on, but I don't like it bolded, - the topic is the case, not the quote. Therefore ALT1. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)