Template:Did you know nominations/La Negra Formation
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MPJ-DK 02:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
La Negra Formation
[edit]... that Jurassic La Negra Formation bears evidence of submarine volcanism that occurred at what is today the coast of Atacama Desert?
- ALT1:... that La Negra Arc is an extinct volcanic arc that existed in northern Chile in the Jurassic?
- ALT2:... that the Jurassic La Negra Formation in northern Chile contains products of submarine volcanism?
ALT3:... that Jurassic La Negra Formation contains products of early Andean volcanism?
Created by Mamayuco (talk). Self-nominated at 12:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 01:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3940 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (3.8% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 126 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 88 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT2 is an appropriate length at 92 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT3 is an appropriate length at 73 characters
- ✓ Mamayuco has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 4 more DYKs.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. I have struck the original hook because the Atacama Desert is not mentioned in the article, and ALT3 because the facts are not explicitly stated in the article. I favour ALT2, but ALT1 is also approved and both of these have inline citations. The article is neutral. The wording is quite technical and many of the sources are not available to me, so I could not judge whether there are any policy or other issues. The nominator is new to DYK and does not need to do a QPQ review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
