Template:Did you know nominations/LGBT cinema in Latin America
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
LGBT cinema in Latin America
- ... that there has been a boom in LGBT+ cinema produced in Latin America, in contrast to its traditionally religious and machismo culture?[1]
- ALT1:... that LGBT+ cinema produced in Latin America may have been influenced by the flamboyant carnival tradition in the region?[2]:168
- Reviewed: Disappearance of Brittanee Drexel
5x expanded by Kingsif (talk). Self-nominated at 13:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC).
- ^ "10 great LGBTQ+ films from Latin America". BFI. Retrieved 17 July 2019.
- ^ B. Ruby Rich (2013). New Queer Cinema: The Director's Cut. Duke University Press. ISBN 9780822354284.
Article meets expansion and length requirements, a QPQ has been done, no close paraphrasing was found, and the article is adequately sourced (apart from the List of films section, though I am willing to ignore this provided that the summaries given are sourced in the respective films articles). Both hooks are interesting and cited inline and either could be promoted; however in the case of the first hook, the link appears to only specifically mention the machismo part, but the article instead uses "religious" instead of "Catholic" (which does not appear anywhere in the article). I am assuming good faith for the offline source for hook two. Also, the sentence "Also based on Italian sex comedy, this is the Pornochanchada genre."; since it's the last sentence of its paragraph, would it be possible to find a source or at least a footnote for this statement? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:50, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Added a ref for Pornochanchada statement, from its article. Kingsif (talk) 02:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, darn, I'd missed that. Fixed :) Kingsif (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, I think we're good to go now; both hooks are approved with the final choice being left to the promoter. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
