Template:Did you know nominations/King John's Hunting Lodge, Axbridge

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by ThaddeusB (talk) 03:54, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
withdrawn by nominator

King John's Hunting Lodge, Axbridge

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that King John's Hunting Lodge, Axbridge (pictured) is not a hunting lodge and was built 200 years after the death of King John?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/R. Durtnell & Sons

Improved to Good Article status by Rodw (talk). Self nominated at 20:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC).

Promoted to GA 28 April
Length OK
neutral, cites, seems free of close paraphrases etc.
nice hook, length OK
QPQ undertaken
Good to go!--Smerus (talk) 12:12, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean, "it's not a hunting lodge"? This needs to be stated and cited inline per Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria (3. Cited hook). Ditto for its being built "200 years after the death of King John". Yoninah (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Not a GA, therefore not eligible. Please improve articles to GA standards before proposing them for DYK as a GA. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

While I see the delisting from GA in the edit history for the page, it is still listed on the talk page. Yoninah (talk) 10:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

NB - it was a GA when I reviewed the article. - then after that held back for a reassessment at the request of Demiurge1000 - Talk:King_John's_Hunting_Lodge,_Axbridge/GA2 - presently awaiting as far as I can see a citation requested by User:Yoninah. Query: if restored to GA status, does the DYK countdown then start from the restoration? --Smerus (talk) 14:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I think it is best to withdraw this nomination until the status of the article is resolved. Is there a mechanism to do this or does an admin need to remove it?— Rod ^talk 15:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)