Template:Did you know nominations/King Gustav III of Sweden and his Brothers
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 16:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
King Gustav III of Sweden and his Brothers
[edit]
- ... that King Gustav III of Sweden and his Brothers (pictured) is an oil painting by the Swedish portrait painter Alexander Roslin depicting three brothers, including two future kings?
- ALT1: ... that Swedish portrait painter Alexander Roslin depicted three brothers (pictured), two of whom were future kings?
- Reviewed: Contributing this Template:Did you know nominations/Paradise Circus, Birmingham which I reviewed.
Created by Hafspajen (talk), Xanthomelanoussprog (talk), Sagaciousphil (talk) , 7&6=thirteen (talk) . Nominated by 7&6=thirteen (☎) at 23:55, 26 February 2015 (UTC).
- Comment Earwig's Copy violation detector give us a clean bill of health. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
It's a nice article, but does not, as far as I can see, have an inline citation for the fact that Charles later became a king. There is also a problem about dates. According to our article, Adolf Frederick, King of Sweden died on February 12, 1771. So when his eldest son Gustav III of Sweden travelled to France on 4 February 1771, he was not the king as the article states. I am also confused about the single use of the name "Karl". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Issue not addressed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- Will take care of it. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- Crisco 1492 Cwmhiraeth. Issues cured. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
This article was moved into article space on February 17th and is new enough and long enough. The points I raised above have been addressed and the hook facts now have suitable inline citations. The article is neutral and the image is a Featured picture and in the public domain. I detected no copyvios. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:32, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
