Template:Did you know nominations/Kerala Nasrani Christian music

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:49, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Kerala Nasrani Christian music

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that traditional ritual Kerala Nasrani Christian music has a form of congregational organum singing that is also seen in the ritual music of Cochin Jews, Hebrew Samaritans and Yemenite Jews?

Created/expanded by User:Robin klein (talk). Self nom at 18:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Comment - there are quite likely to be problems with this article, as outlined at Talk:Kerala Nasrani Christian music#POV, - Sitush (talk) 10:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Comment: the article has been renamed to Saint Thomas Christian music and drastically cut (but is still well over the 1500 minimum), and the creator has been topic banned for six months and can no longer edit the article. Is someone willing to propose a new hook that doesn't use the old article name (and its presumed problems that led to the topic ban, not to mention its lack of a direct inline citation) and address the issues that could arise in a DYK review? Sitush? (I'll see if someone doing the revisions is willing to do so.) BlueMoonset (talk) 18:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Suggestion: I was heavily involved in rewriting the article. How about ALT1: "Saint Thomas Christian music of India may preserve elements of the earliest Christian music due to the Saint Thomas Christian community's isolation and resistance to outside influence?" Cuchullain (talk) 19:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

• Added ALT1 and sig to the above suggestion. Also struck out original hook since it's problematic. I think this is ready for a full review. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:42, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

• Length, date and sourcing of article OK. No signs of plagiarism/copyvio issues although AGF because only first page of main ref available to me. ALT1 is short, accurate and interesting enough and is supported by the one page of the ref that is visible. Mikenorton (talk) 21:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)