The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hilsttalk 14:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Overall: Extra content and less dependence on quotes is a vast improvement. Looks good to me. Seddontalk 22:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Seddon! Thank you for your review! May I ask why you indicated that you feel the article "follows a structure identical" to the Psychology Today article? Looking at the PT article, only one paragraph discusses Asasumasu. Do you mean that the section about Asasumasu coining the term neurodivergence is too similar to the PT article? If that's the case, I can certainly rephrase that section. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
I have now expanded the article with a couple of additional sources so that it reaches over 1,500 words not including quotations. I have also tried paraphrasing some of the quotes. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)