The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 02:11, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Article is new enough (moved from draftspace 17 Dec) and long enough (RPS is 2290). Hook fact is interesting (I prefer ALT0 best, then ALT1) and included in article with source. QPQ is not needed as nom has 0 DYK credits. No problems with Earwig so we are good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:31, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
@Schminnte and PCN02WPS: the first couple times i read ALT0 and ALT1, I assumed that the price was 1% off of $0.99, meaning it's $0.9801 (weird, because 992=9,801...). How about:
ALT3: ... that Kamibox'sA Joke That's Worth $0.99 is priced at $1, but is permanently sold at a 1% discount?
I like it because readers can work out for themselves that it comes out to $0.99, and they're tempted to click through to figure out why it has to be that way. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 10:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
@Theleekycauldron:, I do prefer ALT 0, I feel ALT 3 might be a bit too vague. I don't really know why, maybe because ALT 0 is a bit simpler? Schminnte (talk • contribs) 12:25, 30 December 2022 (UTC)