The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
5x expanded by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 02:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC).
Please, we've had far too many DYKs on radio stations recently, no more. Zin92 (talk) 08:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
@Zin92: I have one more project (which I'm nominating now) and then I'm going to take a bit of a breather from new radio DYKs since I have so much in the pipeline. (Though if any of my GAs are reviewed, I'll bring them to DYK. I also have one non-radio DYK I'm going to put out.) Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Overall: @Sammi Brie: Nice work as usual. I don't find the above comment to be either actionable or relevant, as it seems to be a personal opinion. I would not let comments like Zin92's discourage you from nominating DYKs. If someone feels there are too many DYKs on a certain topic, they are free to expand and nominate an article of their own without belittling others' contributions. Epicgenius (talk) 12:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
@Sammi Brie: Nice work as usual. I don't find the above comment to be either actionable or relevant, as it seems to be a personal opinion. I would not let comments like Zin92's discourage you from nominating DYKs. If someone feels there are too many DYKs on a certain topic, they are free to expand and nominate an article of their own without belittling others' contributions. Epicgenius (talk) 12:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)