Template:Did you know nominations/KATI (Wyoming)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
KATI (Wyoming)
... that a downturn in the regional economy and the rise of a new competitor were cited as reasons for the 1987 demise of Wyoming radio station KATI? Source: Refs 22 and 23, see also Randy Hall's recollections in 2018- ALT1:... that an owner of Wyoming radio station KATI donated the station to the University of Wyoming, only to be "disappointed" when the university opted not to use his gift? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/74158027/university-decides-not-to-renew-kati-am/
Created by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 18:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC).
- Article is newly created, from userspace, and moved to mainspace and DYK nom'd all in the same day. The article is long enough and has citations throughout. All appears to be neutral and the copyvio detector came back mostly clean. There's a quote taken from it, which is attributed and fine. I would like for you to reword the phrase "
never put the station back on the air
" though, which is found in katicasper.com/kati-history/1980s, but I don't think it's such a copyvio problem to hold up the nom. As for the hooks, ALT0 is not that interesting. A business going under due to a recession and competition... that happens all the time. ALT1 is more interesting, as a donation going unused seems more out of the ordinary. QPQ is present. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Article is newly created, from userspace, and moved to mainspace and DYK nom'd all in the same day. The article is long enough and has citations throughout. All appears to be neutral and the copyvio detector came back mostly clean. There's a quote taken from it, which is attributed and fine. I would like for you to reword the phrase "