Template:Did you know nominations/Jurassic Coast
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MPJ-DK 01:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Jurassic Coast
[edit]
Jurassic limestone
- ... that the Jurassic Coast (pictured) reveals 185 million years of the geological history of southern England?
- Reviewed: By the Blue Hawaiian Waters
Improved to Good Article status by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC).
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article was Listed as a Good Article on 15:06, 27 August 2016
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 9119 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 78.2% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- No overall issues detected
- ✓ The media File:PortlandCoast.JPG is free-use
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 93 characters
- ✓ Cwmhiraeth has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/By the Blue Hawaiian Waters was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 17:15, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Kinda feel obsolete to the bot, but here we go. The article was promoted to good article status in the last seven days, it's long enough, neutral, uses inline citations and I cannot see any obvious copyright violations. The one flagged up by the bot is actually a YouTube description copied from the article. The hook is interesting, neutral and cited in the "The World Heritage Site" and "Geology" sections. QPQ has been done. The image is free and used within the article. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
