Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Julie Packard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Julie Packard

[edit]
  • Comment: I have 3 DYK credits, but may review a nomination later.

Created by Rhinopias (talk). Self-nominated at 04:20, 2 April 2019 (UTC).

  • The article is new and long enough. It is impeccably referenced, neutral, and free of any copyright issues. The hook is concise, appealing, and referenced. I have found a photograph on FlickR (and there are more, if we ask for permission). I would suggest including the picture in the hook as well, but then another reviewer would have to approve it. It's a shame we do not have an article about her sister; it would have made a nice double hook. Surtsicna (talk) 15:03, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Packard at a seminar
Packard at a seminar
  • That is a great photo! I assumed there wouldn't be any with an appropriate license. A staff member at the aquarium is aware of the article's creation and told me they are hoping to release the copyright of a portrait of her to Commons, but who knows how long that would take, so this picture definitely works if you think one should be included. So that would make the hook this, if you like the full species name in it. Assuming the caption would need to be as short as this one.
  • Alternatively, I could contact the copyright holder of these photos of the coral species and see if they'd release one to Commons? Although, it'd be hard to see it with such a small thumbnail so maybe not. Rhinopias (talk) 23:40, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
  • It probably would be too small to see, but I think you should ask for it anyway. One day we might have an article about the coral, so the picture would come in handy :) Surtsicna (talk) 07:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
  • I shot them a message! I could create the article rather quickly I'm sure. Rhinopias (talk) 03:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
  • I have written an article about the coral (Gersemia juliepackardae) and linked it in the hooks. Would somebody like to review the new article? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Packard at a seminar
Packard at a seminar
ALT4 is ~180 characters. I don't how long the image caption can be – "Packard speaking about ocean conservation in Chile" would be a long one. Rhinopias (talk) 18:28, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
If Cwmhiraeth is adding an eligible DYK article to the nomination, I believe a QPQ would be reqired. I will be happy to do a full review, once that is clarified. Thanks. Flibirigit (talk) 03:49, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
@Flibirigit: Indeed. I have reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Alfred Kirchner. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Gersemia juliepackardae review

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough. Length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone, with no plagiarism issues deteced. Hook is interesting, properly cited, and mentioned in both articles. Photo of Packard is properly licensed and appears in her article. QPQ requirements are met for the second article. Review of Julie Packard article as per Surtsicna. I have added writing credits for Cwmhiraeth. Approving ALT2, ALT3 and ALT4. Flibirigit (talk) 20:04, 19 May 2019 (UTC)