Template:Did you know nominations/Juil ciego
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Juil ciego, Mexican blind brotula, Blind swamp eel
[edit]( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the Mexican blind brotula, the blind swamp eel and the juil ciego, all cave-dwelling fish in Mexico, are threatened by water pollution?
- ALT1:... that the Mexican blind brotula, the blind swamp eel and the juil ciego are all threatened by pollution of the water in which they live underground?
- Reviewed: In a Persian Market
- Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Why So Lonely and Template:Did you know nominations/Flaming Creatures
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC).
- Review of Mexican blind brotula
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 232 chars to 2101 chars since 23:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC), a 9.06-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2101 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (1.0% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- Review of Juil ciego
- No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 150 chars to 1781 chars since 13:34, 01 March 2013 (UTC), a 11.87-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1781 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (1.0% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- Review of Blind swamp eel
- No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 204 chars to 2344 chars since 11:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC), a 11.49-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2344 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (1.0% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- General comments
- No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length for 3 nominations at 136 characters (90 after subtracting extra links)
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length for 3 nominations at 143 characters (97 after subtracting extra links)
- ✓ Cwmhiraeth has more than 5 DYK credits. 3 QPQ reviews of Template:Did you know nominations/In a Persian Market,Template:Did you know nominations/Why So Lonely,Template:Did you know nominations/Flaming Creatures were performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
As the bot says, all the paragraphs of all the articles are cited, and the articles that they cite contain the information they claim. The hook is cited in all three articles. All the articles are in good shape, and meet the formatting standards for our fish articles. I prefer the original hook myself. Smurrayinchester 07:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
