Template:Did you know nominations/John Sterling (American football)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 15:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

John Sterling (American football), Anthony Harrison, Chuck Compton

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

• John Sterling (American football)
• Anthony Harrison
• Chuck Compton

)

• ... that that John Sterling, Anthony Harrison and Chuck Compton were all signed by the Green Bay Packers as replacement players because of a players' strike during the 1987 NFL season?

Sources:

• John Sterling: [1]
• Anthony Harrison: [2]
• Chuck Compton: [3]

• Reviewed: (1) Ann Corcoran; (2) Holmium; (3) George Munday

5x expanded by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/John Sterling (American football); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Another multi-article nomination, I see? I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Are you sure you don't want to expand four more replacements and add them here? BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:51, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Hahahahaha I said no more seven-parters... « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I've reviewed each of the three articles and they all appear to pass the criteria. This nomination appears good to go! BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:53, 12 August 2023 (UTC)