Template:Did you know nominations/Jennifers' Law (Connecticut)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Jennifer's Law (Connecticut)

(

)

~~... that Jennifers' Law is named after two Connecticut women killed by their husbands during divorce proceedings?~~
- ALT1:... that Jennifers' Law expands the definition of domestic violence in Connecticut to include coercive control? Source: Hartford Courant

Created by Eggishorn (talk). Self-nominated at 01:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems: - The sentence in the first hook is not present in the article. The sentence in the lead could be modified to resemble it. The second hook interprets a primary source although the citation of the first hook does verify the sentence of the second one. (Resolved)

QPQ: None required.

Overall:

Why not use the second hook then? It is obviously cited. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 07:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Eggishorn, alright. Just wanted to make sure you wanted it that way. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 07:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

@Tayi Arajakate:, it fine with me. It's arguably more defensible which is why I provided it as the alt. Thanks for the review. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 07:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)