Template:Did you know nominations/Jean Clédat, Bawit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Jean Clédat, Bawit

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

)

... that Jean Clédat uncovered the monastery of Apa Apollo, founded in the fourth century, whilst excavating at Bawit in the winter of 1903?

Created/expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 17:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Jean Clédat ONLY: Length is 2508 characters, well cited, neutral, good hook. --Quantum 7 19:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Bawit technically meets the length guidelines (1739), but is currently rated as a stub by three wikiprojects. Either expand Bawit to at least a class C article, or else just list it as a Jean Clédat DYK. --Quantum 7 01:03, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

I don't believe any DYK nomination can be required to be C class; most of the ones I've reviewed and submitted have been Start class, which is between Stub and C. DYK only has a prohibition against Stub-class articles, or articles that seem to be stubs regardless of class assigned on the talk page. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Bawit now classified as Start class. I don't see any other problems.

QPQ, Dr Blofeld, please ? --PFHLai (talk) 01:57, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

QPQ: either two for Dr Blofeld, or one each from Dr Blofeld and from Rosiestep, please, since this is a two-article nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

DONE: Reviewed Agincourt Square, Monmouth and Giring Ganesha. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

This is a two-article nomination, yet the review only mentions a single length (which matches the Jean Clédat article length). The Bawit article is currently still listed as a stub, and cannot be one if it is to be eligible for inclusion in this nomination; its length looks okay, but I'll leave it to the original reviewer to do a full review of that article. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice that Bawit was included in the nomination. Fixing now. --Quantum 7 01:03, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Bewit meets criteria for Start class; re-assessed. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Bawit isn't a stub.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

I agree with the classification as Start. Approving.

(Note: sig omitted from above line; was entered 18:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC) by Quantum7)

Adding all-important tick that was omitted (along with sig, which I have inserted based on History entry) from previous. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)