The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BlueMoonsettalk 20:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
This article had already been nominated at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink; the relevant portions of the review below have been copied there; this is being closed as "unsuccessful" because it wouldn't have survived as a separate nomination, even had the other nomination not already existed.
Overall: The article would be eligible for DYK IMO, however, a single thing stands out that destroys the nom; this article was created in October and last made in November, so unfortunately I am going to fail this. Having since discovered that this is apart of a broader process, I am reversing my decision and suggesting a pass. — Knightoftheswords 17:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC) — Knightoftheswords 13:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Pity, we could have pulled an epic move and did it as an image hook. Bremps... 22:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Wait, it was actually nominated with a few other articles in mid-October here, shortly after creation. It was only spun out of the larger hook recently. Knightoftheswords281Bremps... 22:57, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
No, we are not removing this from the mass nomination. Bremps, please transfer your review to the mass nomination. Schwede66 19:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
The topic meets DYK requirements but this nomination is to be closed as the topic had already been included in another nomination. Schwede66 19:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)