Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Jack Whicher

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Jack Whicher's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 18:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC).

DYK toolbox

Jack Whicher, The Suspicions of Mr Whicher

[edit]
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links:
)

Created/expanded by Jack1956 (talk). Self nominated at 14:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Comment: This page was incorrectly filed under February 18 instead of April 16 (when the expansion of the first article began). So I've moved it.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 14:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
  • The hook is the right length and referenced (maybe a sentence too late, but that's just being picky). The Jack Whicher article clearly qualifies for length, formatting, references, etc., but I have one hang-up - what some may think is plagiarism in one sentence. The exact and somewhat flowery words "arrived in Wiltshire with the nation’s hopes resting on his shoulders and quietly confident of success" are in the Daily Mail review cited immediately following. If it is meant as a quote it should be in quotation marks. I'll suggest not quoting it, just paraphrasing it in much less flowery terms, in which case the citation is enough to avoid plagiarism suspicions. I'll emphasize that this is likely to be viewed as a borderline case in some parts of the world, but fairly serious in other parts, and suggest that the author review the whole article for similar "hidden quotes."
The Suspicions of Mr Whicher likely would not qualify on its own, due to much of the text being a list and plot synopsis (actually there are 2 sections of synopsis, which should be cleaned up). I don't see any reason to exclude The Suspicions however from the hook, other than a touch of cleanup. With some attention paid to the possible plagiarism issue, this should be passed pretty easily. Smallbones(smalltalk) 15:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Jack_Whicher&oldid=1099641497"