Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Italian Parliament (1928-1939)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 21:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator per WT:DYK#Please withdraw following nominations

Italian Parliament (1928-1939)

[edit]
  • ... that under a 1939 law enacted by the Italian Parliament, politicians would be required to fight in "front-line units" in the event of war?

Created by LavaBaron (talk). Self-nominated at 18:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC).

  • Comment Removed the second "Italian", as it seems redundant. Edwardx (talk) 21:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I've struck ALT0 because the source by no means says that with anything like clarity. Aside from there being nothing to indicate that this bill was enacted into law, the phrases "privilege of being called to arms" and "drafting" are ambiguous at best.
ALT1 ... that in 1938 the Italian Parliament's Chamber of Deputies "committed long-awaited suicide"?
  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 18:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 5340 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely (1.0% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm also somewhat concerned that so much of the article is cited to contemporaneous sources rather than retrospective, especially since at least one of the sources used speaks with a touch of amusement. EEng 17:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
  • @LavaBaron: EEng's comments effectively put a hold on this nomination and are noted. The article would ideally have more contemporary sources but it does not, and I think it should proceed regardless. The article is new enough and long enough. It is neutral and my spot checks did not reveal any policy issues. ALT1 will not do because the quoted phrase does not appear in the article, and the sentence it refers to requires an inline citation. If the ALT1 hook were rewritten to just state that the parliament abolished itself in 1938, I could pass this nomination. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:16, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
The quote can be added to the article, obviously. Do I have to do everything? EEng 14:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)