The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Overall: Copyvio check is fine, article is long enough and new enough. Looks like this is your third DYK nomination, so no QPQ required. The hook fact is included in the article and is contained in two sources. However, as per MOS:INTRO the hook fact appears in the lead, but it should also appear somewhere else in the article. Let me know when you've addressed this minor issue, thanks. DrThneed (talk) 08:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Riley1012, thanks. All good now, both hooks approved so promoter can take their choice, but personally I prefer the detail of ALT1. DrThneed (talk) 00:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio check is fine, article is long enough and new enough. Looks like this is your third DYK nomination, so no QPQ required. The hook fact is included in the article and is contained in two sources. However, as per MOS:INTRO the hook fact appears in the lead, but it should also appear somewhere else in the article. Let me know when you've addressed this minor issue, thanks. DrThneed (talk) 08:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
