Template:Did you know nominations/Ion Agârbiceanu
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 04:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ion Agârbiceanu
[edit]- ... that Romanian writer Ion Agârbiceanu twice fled advancing Hungarian authorities: in 1916, after the Battle of Transylvania; and in 1940, after the Second Vienna Award?
- ALT1:... that during the interwar period, Romanian priest Ion Agârbiceanu was a supporter of eugenics, a largely secular movement?
- ALT2:... that Romanian writer Ion Agârbiceanu was made a Senator under the National Renaissance Front regime, and that the later communist authorities granted him two medals?
- ALT3:... that Romanian writer Ion Agârbiceanu was influenced in his work by the four years he spent as a parish priest in the Apuseni Mountains?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Yunnan nuthatch
- Comment: I didn't start the article, and it's not a 5x expansion, but the article is less than five days old, regardless, and the text is entirely different from what it was before I rewrote it.
5x expanded by Biruitorul (talk). Self nominated at 15:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC).
- ALT3 would be my personal favorite as the hook is easy to understand (and probably since I'm a fan of the outdoors). I think the DYK nom is acceptable by the means that the page is only five days old, but I suppose that someone else should confirm. --GouramiWatcher(?) 15:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Full review needed. Comments above do not constitute a valid review. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
This is a new article with three editors involved in its creation and expansion; I have added the names of the other two to the credits. The article is new enough and long enough. I would choose to go for ALT3 which has inline citations for the hook facts (the other hooks are also OK as far as I can see). The article is neutral and no policy issues were found. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
