Template:Did you know nominations/Interpretatio Christiana
The following is an archived discussion of Interpretatio Christiana's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Interpretatio Christiana
[edit]- ... that Christian reinterpretation of pagan traditions, sacred sites and lore was officially sanctioned as a means to facilitate Christianization?
Created by Altenmann (talk). Self nominated at 07:59, 28 February 2013 (UTC).
Date, length and hook all OK. Good to go.
The anonymous reviewer above failed to note the three unsourced paragraphs in the article: the first under "Reinterpretation of sacred sites" and the first two under "Scholarship". All three will need at least one inline source each. I've also put in a piped link to the article in the hook above rather than relying on a redirect. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- Two sources to the first mentioned section added. Section "scholarship is ..er.. summary of some scholar works, mentioned by names. I didn't find it necessary to add references to references. It is is such a big hurdle, I am more than happe to delete the secxtion. Or retract the mnomination of this historically important, well researched but neglected in wikipedia subject despite my announcement in wikiproect. Good luck to surrize me more about Gibraltar. - Altenmann >t 17:45, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
