Template:Did you know nominations/International Harp Archive
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
International Harp Archive
[edit]... that Brigham Young Unversity's International Harp Archive is home to the largest collection of harp materials in the world?Source: American Harp Society- ALT1:... that Brigham Young Unversity's International Harp Archive has more than 11,000 scores and sound recordings that feature the harp? Source: World Harp Congress
- Reviewed: Plotius Pegasus
Created by JAGrace (BYU) (talk). Self-nominated at 19:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC).
Review
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral: - The claim that it is the largest such archive is somewhat promotional and is not adequately supported by the source which doesn't seem to be independent and just says "perhaps".
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - Too many phrases used without significant change from here
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - The first hook won't do, as explained above. ALT1 is ok
- Interesting:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Andrew D. (talk) 19:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Andrew Davidson: Thank you for your review. I made some changes to the International Harp Archive page. If you would go ahead and check out the page I would appreciate it. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do. Thanks! JAGrace (BYU) (talk) 19:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- Approving ALT1 (checks out with inline citation) now that copyvio and neutrality concerns have been addressed. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)