Template:Did you know nominations/International Airport Centers, L.L.C. v. Citrin

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 12:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

International Airport Centers, L.L.C. v. Citrin

(

)

If an employee erases the hard-drive of an employer-owned machine, it can be considered a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Created/expanded by Qqz (talk). Nominated by Dsheffie (talk) at 00:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Please format the hook as a question with a wikilink to the DYK candidate article. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Age, length OK. No close paraphrasing seen. Hook ref verified. It would be nice to add page numbers to footnote 1. Here is a suggested alt that incorporates the page link:
ALT1: ... that an employee who erases the hard drive of an employer-owned computer is considered in violation of the U.S. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act? Yoninah (talk) 16:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I've just left a note on the nominator's usertalkpage asking for a response. --PFHLai (talk) 21:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

That sounds great. I'm really sure what I'm supposed to do (new to this) but the hook looks great! Dsheffie (talk) 21:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your approval. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)