Template:Did you know nominations/Intenso Project
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 22:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Intenso Project
[edit]- ...
that Intenso Project is a supergroup?
- Comment: I'm making a bit of a stab as to what the definition of supergroup actually is, I believe it's a group containing more than one notable member from two or more other bands? Confirmation would be appreciated.
Created by Launchballer (talk). Self-nominated at 00:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC).
- Comment: does referring to the band as a supergroup appear in the article or in reliable sources? --ℕ ℱ 20:15, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- The word "supergroup" does not appear anywhere in conjunction with the term "Intenso Project", however they are by definition a supergroup.--Launchballer 20:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hook facts must appear in the article and must be supported by an inline-citation to a reliable source. - Dravecky (talk) 21:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that Intenso Project included members from Phats & Small and Double Trouble?--Launchballer 21:48, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- The word "supergroup" does not appear anywhere in conjunction with the term "Intenso Project", however they are by definition a supergroup.--Launchballer 20:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Has a QPQ been performed in support of this nomination yet? Nominator is well over the threshold for needing to perform one. - Dravecky (talk) 17:07, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Full review needed, now that QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- ... The reference for the DYK hook fact is not a reference. The ref is to an article that may have mentioned this group by a newspaper in 2005 is not a reference. A page number would be helpful but the day that is appeared or a url would be more helpful. Victuallers (talk) 09:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Article was last edited by nominator on July 7, 2015, but it has yet to be added to any categories. I have just swept the article for the basic formatting fox of putting song titles in quotation marks and album titles in italics, which the article had lacked utterly until now. The "reference" that a song is included on an album is simply the name of that album, the publisher, and the year. Really, only two proper references are included and only one of them is a reliable third-party media source. - Dravecky (talk) 11:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- There is a reference at Ben Ofoedu I really should leech, although I always verify the contents of article aggregators before using them and I couldn't verify the one new fact (the existence of "Steve Dunkley") so I'm leaving it. What's wrong with using CDs as sources? Much of the content repeated here they have to print, for legal reasons, and offline sources are just as valid as online sources. However, I will have another look for sources. I've also added a category--Launchballer 14:43, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Just to make it clear. My problem above with the reference is not that its a CD. My problem is that your ref never said that it was a CD. The person who approves the hook fact either has to check the fact or be assured that with AGF and time they could find it. If I take the CD from you then could you find it given a title a year and a publisher? Surely the CD has some ident number? (International Standard Recording Code)? Victuallers (talk) 23:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- The Daily Mail never released any other CDs called Summer Days but is SUMMERCD001 02 what you're after?--Launchballer 09:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK ... you have found "SUMMERCD001 02" and you have noticed the points above... Do you need help with adding this information? Note : minor point. The article is labelled as a stub. That's not allowed at DYK. Could someone now find this reference? Have you said if its a CD? Victuallers (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Decided it was easier to just do it. I have added the missing information.I have changed the stub to start. I have also added an extra ref to support the hook facts. The article is quite short but long enough. No sign of paraphrasing. its neutral and there is no image. Victuallers (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK ... you have found "SUMMERCD001 02" and you have noticed the points above... Do you need help with adding this information? Note : minor point. The article is labelled as a stub. That's not allowed at DYK. Could someone now find this reference? Have you said if its a CD? Victuallers (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- The Daily Mail never released any other CDs called Summer Days but is SUMMERCD001 02 what you're after?--Launchballer 09:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Just to make it clear. My problem above with the reference is not that its a CD. My problem is that your ref never said that it was a CD. The person who approves the hook fact either has to check the fact or be assured that with AGF and time they could find it. If I take the CD from you then could you find it given a title a year and a publisher? Surely the CD has some ident number? (International Standard Recording Code)? Victuallers (talk) 23:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- There is a reference at Ben Ofoedu I really should leech, although I always verify the contents of article aggregators before using them and I couldn't verify the one new fact (the existence of "Steve Dunkley") so I'm leaving it. What's wrong with using CDs as sources? Much of the content repeated here they have to print, for legal reasons, and offline sources are just as valid as online sources. However, I will have another look for sources. I've also added a category--Launchballer 14:43, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
