Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/In the Blue of Evening

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

In the Blue of Evening

[edit]

5x expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk) and Miyagawa (talk). Nominated by Miyagawa (talk) at 12:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article has been expanded from 125 chars to 1953 chars since 18:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC), a 15.62-fold expansion
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 1953 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • The probability of copyright violation is 3.8%. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected
    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 149 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 188 characters
    • Miyagawa has 535 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Ishka was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 01:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

  • I think it actually added your signature as it's not expecting hooks to be signed. There is less confidence in the processing of the alts than in the main hook as the formatting is much more variable; however the exact count matters less than whether it's over 200. Intelligentsium 21:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review needed by human reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
5x expansion confirmed, meets length guidelines. Low chance of copyright violation, and no close paraphrasing found. Both hooks are neutral, short, interesting and linked to reliable source. Reference is offline but I'll accept in good faith. ALT1 is my preferred choice. MWright96 (talk) 11:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)