Template:Did you know nominations/Illegal operation
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Illegal operation
- ... that "illegal operation" was a common euphemism for abortion in early 20th century North American newspapers? Source: “In polite company, abortion wasn't even whispered. It was referred to in newspapers as ‘an illegal operation,’ usually reported only when those who performed abortions were arrested or women who had abortions turned up in emergency rooms hemorrhaging, with raging infections, or dead.“Neville, Anne (2002-11-25). "'I WAS DOING SOMETHING ILLEGAL'". Buffalo News. Retrieved 2022-09-03.
Alternate image for option 1:
- ALT1: ... that some American films like The Doctor and the Girl used the euphemism "illegal operation" in dialogue about abortion? Source: the phrase “illegal operation” appeared in the 1949 American film The Doctor and the Girl, “[Signaling] the return of veiled dialogue in abortion narratives as Breen compromised by allowing them to refer to ‘an illegal operation’ ... Despite the vagueness of the phrase ‘illegal operation’, studios realized that the PCA had just allowed an abortion narrative on the screen.”Kirby, David A. (2017-09-19). "Regulating cinematic stories about reproduction: pregnancy, childbirth, abortion and movie censorship in the US, 1930–1958". The British Journal for the History of Science. 50 (3): 451–472. doi:10.1017/S0007087417000814. ISSN 0007-0874 – via Cambridge.org.
- Reviewed: QPQ Template:Did you know nominations/Philippe I, Duke of Orléans
Converted from a redirect by Jengod (talk). Self-nominated at 04:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC).
References
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article:
- Clear at 100px: - N
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Both hooks approved but recommend the original. Image denied as it is not clear at 100 by 100 pixels, the size at which DYK images appear on the Main Page. ––FormalDude (talk) 12:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for reviewing. Alt image just in case it helps anyone:
- jengod (talk) 18:36, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- That image looks much better, thanks for providing. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:47, 5 September 2022 (UTC)