Template:Did you know nominations/Ibiranu

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 21:29, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Ibiranu

(

)

... that cuneiform tablets discovered at the ancient city-state of Ugarit included several letters of reprimand sent to its king Ibiranu by his Hittite overloards concerning his failures in his vassal duties?

Created/expanded by Zozo2kx (talk). Self nom at 08:16, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Long enough; expanded from a previous redirect. Date ok. Both paragraphs have inline citations, however, all 3 refs are offline books from 1999 and 2003. Digging deeper: Reviewing the linked German language article shows it lacks refs. Reviewing the linked Hungarian language article shows a ref, but a different one. AGF that hook is referenced appropriately and that there are no policy issues. Hook is too long @ 204 ch; here's ALT1.

... that cuneiform tablets discovered at the ancient city-state of Ugarit included several letters of reprimand sent to its king Ibiranu by Hittite overloards concerning failures in his vassal duties? --Rosiestep (talk) 03:33, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm fine with ALT1. Thanks for the review. Yazan (talk) 06:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

ALT1 good to go. --Rosiestep (talk) 14:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC)